|
September 27, 2008
by HERBERT
E.
MEYER
As you've probably noticed by now, the twenty-first century has gotten
off to a rocky start. In 2001, on September 11, we were attacked. And
now our country's financial system is collapsing. This makes for two
"unimaginable" events within a decade.
How could 19 hijackers succeed against the world's greatest military
power? And how could history's strongest and most productive economy
seize up virtually overnight? Of course, there are complicated and
highly technical explanations for each of these disasters. Some books
have already been written about the causes of 9-11, and others are sure
to come along in the years and decades ahead. No doubt publishers are
already signing contracts for books about how today's financial meltdown
happened.
But if you put both "unimaginable" events together, you'll see something
that the experts won't ever see -- or won't say out loud because it
sounds too simplistic and unsophisticated. Let me use an analogy to
illuminate the common thread - what liberals would call the "root cause"
-- that runs through both these "unimaginable" events:
Most of us fly from time to time, and the airplanes that carry us around
the country, and the world, are marvelous pieces of equipment. Today's
jetliners are the products of centuries of science, technology, business
acumen and financial prowess. They are big, powerful -- and remarkably
safe; the back-up systems have back-up systems.
The Pilots Pay Attention
These jetliners are also complicated pieces of equipment, which is why
the pilots who fly them are not only technically competent but
intellectually capable of concentrating on doing their jobs well. These
pilots aren't sitting in the cockpit working on The New York Times
crossword puzzle, or playing music on their iPods, or fooling
around with the flight attendants. They are paying absolute, total
attention to bringing their plane and its passengers safely to their
destinations. If they see the plane drifting just one degree off course,
or if they see the oil pressure in an engine dropping even slightly,
they deal swiftly and effectively with this very minor problem before it
becomes a major problem -- or perhaps a problem too big to resolve
without catastrophe. It's hard work, and this is why pilots are
exhausted even after an uneventful flight.
A modern country is like a jetliner. It's the product of centuries of
human development, and it's a marvelous piece of equipment. In a sense,
even the back-up systems have back-up systems. But a modern country is
also a very complicated piece of equipment. Managing it successfully --
in other words, bringing its citizens safely into the future -- takes
both technical competence and, perhaps even more important, intense
concentration. You've got to spot little problems quickly, then deal
with them effectively before they become too big to deal with.
Read the U.S. constitution, and you'll see that our country's "cockpit"
isn't the White House; it's Congress. It's the Congress, not the
President, which controls the money by raising taxes and enacting the
federal budget. It's the Congress that makes our laws and oversees the
executive departments and agencies that implement these laws and write
the regulations that support them.
My fellow Americans: We've been putting clowns in the cockpit.
I don't mean this to be rude -- and I certainly don't mean this to be
partisan -- but isn't it obvious that most of the people we've elected
to the House and Senate haven't got the technical knowledge and the
intellectual firepower to guide our country safely through the turbulent
skies? And isn't it obvious that most of these preening buffoons spend
nearly all their time lining their own pockets, showboating, raising
money for their re-elections or running for higher offices -- in short,
concentrating their energies and attention on everything except
doing the jobs for which we've elected them?
Of course there are exceptions in both political parties. Every so
often, you're watching some television news talk show and suddenly
there's a member of Congress on camera you've never heard of before who
actually knows what he or she is talking about. But the blond news
anchorette with teeth like Chiclets keeps interrupting -- and by the
time your spouse comes running into the room to see what you're shouting
about the interview is over even before you've gotten the House or
Senate member's name. And chances are you'll never see this splendid
lawmaker on television again. There just aren't enough of these talented
and dedicated lawmakers in Congress to get the job done.
We've let this go on for too long, and now we're in a real jam: Our
economy is teetering on the edge of a cliff, we're in the midst of a war
-- and we're relying on the people who got us into these unimaginable
disasters to get us out of them. Fat chance.
A New Kind of Congress
We need to re-think the role of Congress, and fast. Given the inherent
complexity of our country, and the world's political turbulence, we've
got to start electing a different kind of person to the House and
Senate. Whether we prefer candidates who are Republicans, Democrats,
liberals, conservatives, independents, libertarians, or who subscribe to
any other party or philosophy, we've got to be sure that these
individuals have the competence to cope with the issues that confront
us, and the willingness to concentrate their total attention on doing
the job. And if this leaves them with insufficient time for enriching
themselves, or for raising a re-election war chest, or planning
campaigns for higher office -- so be it. Candidates who don't want the
job under these conditions shouldn't be running for them. And those who
already have these jobs and don't like the new criteria should get out
of the way -- or he shoved out of the way by us -- to make room for
better men and women. Our lives and our fortunes -- literally, in both
cases -- depend on getting this right.
I used to be in the intelligence business, and when we sent our
projections to the President we always told him whether we were
"uncertain" or "reasonably certain" or "highly confident" that whatever
we were projecting actually would happen. For the first time in my life,
I'm going to make a political projection in which I have total,
100-percent confidence:
If we keep putting clowns in the cockpit, at some time down the road --
two years from now, or five years, or in a decade -- there's going to be
a third "unimaginable" event.
|